zoveel nieuws en verhalen dat gisteren echt niet meer te volgen was hoe of wat..
dit is het meest recente, redelijk betrouwbare bericht van een NIH-bron hieromtrent
maar een en ander kan wellicht een politiek tintje hebben
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/07/01/ ... er-is-out/
John T. Burklow, a spokesman for NIH, says the FDA-NIH paper has been accepted for publication but that the authors decided to pull it back to conduct additional experiments. Publication will depend on how long it takes to fully address questions. “It’s a matter of getting it right,” he says.
Eerderberichtte het wall street journal dat de papers van hogerhand op "hold" waren gezet:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 39290.html
In an email between scientists familiar with the situation, viewed by the Wall Street Journal, a researcher said the two teams were asked to put their papers on hold because senior public-health officials wanted to see consensus—or at least an explanation of how and why the papers reached different conclusions, said the people familiar with the situation.
